Development and Comparison of Scoring Functions in Curriculum Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Curriculum Learning is the presentation of samples to the machine learning model in a meaningful order instead of a random order. The main challenge of Curriculum Learning is determining how to rank these samples. The ranking of the samples is expressed by the scoring function. In this study, scoring functions were compared using data set features, using the model to be trained, and using another model and their ensemble versions. Experiments were performed for 4 images and 4 text datasets. No significant differences were found between scoring functions for text datasets, but significant improvements were obtained in scoring functions created using transfer learning compared to classical model training and other scoring functions for image datasets. It shows that different new scoring functions are waiting to be found for text classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2022.
Builds on
7 of 24 references.
References · 7
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
- 2019On The Power of Curriculum Learning in Training Deep Networkscited by 286
- 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 202
- 2021Curriculum learning for language modelingcited by 32
- 2019Sarcasm Detection using Hybrid Neural Networkcited by 23
- 2021Deep Curriculum Learning for PolSAR Image Classificationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.