Statistical Limits for Testing Correlation of Hypergraphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we consider the hypothesis testing of correlation between two m-uniform hypergraphs on n unlabelled nodes. Under the null hypothesis, the hypergraphs are independent, while under the alternative hypothesis, the hyperdges have the same marginal distributions as in the null hypothesis but are correlated after some unknown node permutation. We focus on two scenarios: the hypergraphs are generated from the Gaussian-Wigner model and the dense Erd"os-R'enyi model. We derive the sharp information-theoretic testing threshold. Above the threshold, there exists a powerful test to distinguish the alternative hypothesis from the null hypothesis. Below the threshold, the alternative hypothesis and the null hypothesis are not distinguishable. The threshold involves m and decreases as m gets larger. This indicates testing correlation of hypergraphs (m≥3) becomes easier than testing correlation of graphs (m=2)
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2022.
Builds on
9 of 26 references.
References · 9
- 2018Efficient random graph matching via degree profilescited by 48
- 2018(Nearly) Efficient Algorithms for the Graph Matching Problem on Correlated Random Graphscited by 29
- 2018Seeded Graph Matching via Large Neighborhood Statisticscited by 27
- 2020Testing correlation of unlabeled random graphscited by 26
- 2021Testing network correlation efficiently via counting treescited by 22
- 2019Spectral Graph Matching and Regularized Quadratic Relaxations I: The Gaussian Modelcited by 13
- 2013An efficient reconciliation algorithm for social networkscited by 12
- 2020Graph Matching with Partially-Correct Seedscited by 10
- 2015An Efficient Multilinear Optimization Framework for Hypergraph Matchingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.