Managers versus Machines: Do Algorithms Replicate Human Intuition in Credit Ratings?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We use machine learning techniques to investigate whether it is possible to replicate the behavior of bank managers who assess the risk of commercial loans made by a large commercial US bank. Even though a typical bank already relies on an algorithmic scorecard process to evaluate risk, bank managers are given significant latitude in adjusting the risk score in order to account for other holistic factors based on their intuition and experience. We show that it is possible to find machine learning algorithms that can replicate the behavior of the bank managers. The input to the algorithms consists of a combination of standard financials and soft information available to bank managers as part of the typical loan review process. We also document the presence of significant heterogeneity in the adjustment process that can be traced to differences across managers and industries. Our results highlight the effectiveness of machine learning based analytic approaches to banking and the potential challenges to high-skill jobs in the financial sector.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2022.
Builds on
4 of 41 references.
References · 4
- 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 171
- 2018Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inferencecited by 62
- 2020Binary Choice under Asymmetric Loss in a Data-Rich Environment: Theory and an Application to Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 3
- 2018BooST: Boosting Smooth Trees for Partial Effect Estimation in Nonlinear Regressionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.