mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting and Localizing Copy-Move and Image-Splicing Forgery

arXiv 2202.04069 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2022cs.CV cs.LG eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the world of fake news and deepfakes, there have been an alarmingly large number of cases of images being tampered with and published in newspapers, used in court, and posted on social media for defamation purposes. Detecting these tampered images is an important task and one we try to tackle. In this paper, we focus on the methods to detect if an image has been tampered with using both Deep Learning and Image transformation methods and comparing the performances and robustness of each method. We then attempt to identify the tampered area of the image and predict the corresponding mask. Based on the results, suggestions and approaches are provided to achieve a more robust framework to detect and identify the forgeries.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.

Builds on

5 of 22 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2018Satellite Image Forgery Detection and Localization Using GAN and One-Class Classifiercited by 14
  4. 2020D-Unet: A Dual-encoder U-Net for Image Splicing Forgery Detection and Localizationcited by 5
  5. 2018Camera-based Image Forgery Localization using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.