Local Linear Convergence of Gradient Methods for Subspace Optimization via Strict Complementarity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider optimization problems in which the goal is find a k-dimensional subspace of ℝn, k<<n, which minimizes a convex and smooth loss. Such problems generalize the fundamental task of principal component analysis (PCA) to include robust and sparse counterparts, and logistic PCA for binary data, among others. This problem could be approached either via nonconvex gradient methods with highly-efficient iterations, but for which arguing about fast convergence to a global minimizer is difficult or, via a convex relaxation for which arguing about convergence to a global minimizer is straightforward, but the corresponding methods are often inefficient in high dimensions. In this work we bridge these two approaches under a strict complementarity assumption, which in particular implies that the optimal solution to the convex relaxation is unique and is also the optimal solution to the original nonconvex problem. Our main result is a proof that a natural nonconvex gradient method which is textitSVD-free and requires only a single QR-factorization of an n× k matrix per iteration, converges locally with a linear rate. We also establish linear convergence results for the nonconvex projected gradient method, and the Frank-Wolfe method when applied to the convex relaxation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.
Builds on
17 of 36 references.
References · 17
- 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 569
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
- 2015Fast low-rank estimation by projected gradient descent: General statistical and algorithmic guaranteescited by 68
- 2016Error bounds, quadratic growth, and linear convergence of proximal methodscited by 59
- 2015Dropping Convexity for Faster Semi-definite Optimizationcited by 40
- 2018An Overview of Robust Subspace Recoverycited by 29
- 2016Finding Low-Rank Solutions via Non-Convex Matrix Factorization, Efficiently and Provablycited by 22
- 2014Fast, Robust and Non-convex Subspace Recoverycited by 20
- 2017A Well-Tempered Landscape for Non-convex Robust Subspace Recoverycited by 18
- 2020List Decodable Subspace Recoverycited by 13
- 2015Fast Stochastic Algorithms for SVD and PCA: Convergence Properties and Convexitycited by 9
- 2019On the Convergence of Projected-Gradient Methods with Low-Rank Projections for Smooth Convex Minimization over Trace-Norm Balls and Related Problemscited by 8
5 more
- 2020Spectral Frank-Wolfe Algorithm: Strict Complementarity and Linear Convergencecited by 8
- 2019Linear Convergence of Frank-Wolfe for Rank-One Matrix Recovery Without Strong Convexitycited by 7
- 2015Dimensionality Reduction for Binary Data through the Projection of Natural Parameterscited by 6
- 2015Global Convergence of a Grassmannian Gradient Descent Algorithm for Subspace Estimationcited by 5
- 2015Randomized Robust Subspace Recovery for High Dimensional Data Matricescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.