Spotting Anomalous Trades in NFT Markets: The Case of NBA Topshot
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Non-Fungible Token (NFT) markets are one of the fastest growing digital markets today, with the sales during the third quarter of 2021 exceeding 10 billions! Nevertheless, these emerging markets - similar to traditional emerging marketplaces - can be seen as a great opportunity for illegal activities (e.g., money laundering, sale of illegal goods etc.). In this study we focus on a specific marketplace, namely NBA TopShot, that facilitates the purchase and (peer-to-peer) trading of sports collectibles. Our objective is to build a framework that is able to label peer-to-peer transactions on the platform as anomalous or not. To achieve our objective we begin by building a model for the profit to be made by selling a specific collectible on the platform. We then use RFCDE - a random forest model for the conditional density of the dependent variable - to model the errors from the profit models. This step allows us to estimate the probability of a transaction being anomalous. We finally label as anomalous any transaction whose aforementioned probability is less than 1%. Given the absence of ground truth for evaluating the model in terms of its classification of transactions, we analyze the trade networks formed from these anomalous transactions and compare it with the full trade network of the platform. Our results indicate that these two networks are statistically different when it comes to network metrics such as, edge density, closure, node centrality and node degree distribution. This network analysis provides additional evidence that these transactions do not follow the same patterns that the rest of the trades on the platform follow. However, we would like to emphasize here that this does not mean that these transactions are also illegal. These transactions will need to be further audited from the appropriate entities to verify whether or not they are illicit.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Strategic Tradeoffs Between Humans and AI in Multi-Agent Bargainingcited by 11
- 2023NFTVis: Visual Analysis of NFT Performancecited by 1
- 2023Visually Wired NFTs: Exploring the Role of Inspiration in Non-Fungible Tokenscited by 0
- 2023Abnormal Trading Detection in the NFT Marketcited by 0
- 2025Clustering and analysis of user behaviour in blockchain: A case study of Planet IXcited by 0
- 2025Strategic Tradeoffs Between Humans and AI in Multi-Agent Bargaining11 Sep 2025
- 2025Clustering and analysis of user behaviour in blockchain: A case study of Planet IX16 Apr 2025
- 2023NFTVis: Visual Analysis of NFT Performance5 Jun 2023
- 2023Abnormal Trading Detection in the NFT Market25 May 2023
- 2023Visually Wired NFTs: Exploring the Role of Inspiration in Non-Fungible Tokens29 Mar 2023