The Ecological Footprint of Neural Machine Translation Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past decade, deep learning (DL) has led to significant advancements in various fields of artificial intelligence, including machine translation (MT). These advancements would not be possible without the ever-growing volumes of data and the hardware that allows large DL models to be trained efficiently. Due to the large amount of computing cores as well as dedicated memory, graphics processing units (GPUs) are a more effective hardware solution for training and inference with DL models than central processing units (CPUs). However, the former is very power demanding. The electrical power consumption has economical as well as ecological implications. This chapter focuses on the ecological footprint of neural MT systems. It starts from the power drain during the training of and the inference with neural MT models and moves towards the environment impact, in terms of carbon dioxide emissions. Different architectures (RNN and Transformer) and different GPUs (consumer-grate NVidia 1080Ti and workstation-grade NVidia P100) are compared. Then, the overall CO2 offload is calculated for Ireland and the Netherlands. The NMT models and their ecological impact are compared to common household appliances to draw a more clear picture. The last part of this chapter analyses quantization, a technique for reducing the size and complexity of models, as a way to reduce power consumption. As quantized models can run on CPUs, they present a power-efficient inference solution without depending on a GPU.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.
Builds on
25 of 56 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
13 more
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
- 2018LQ-Nets: Learned Quantization for Highly Accurate and Compact Deep Neural Networkscited by 272
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
- 2016Ternary Weight Networkscited by 195
- 2014Recurrent Neural Network Regularizationcited by 189
- 2017MorphNet: Fast & Simple Resource-Constrained Structure Learning of Deep Networkscited by 92
- 2018Linguistically-Informed Self-Attention for Semantic Role Labelingcited by 71
- 2019Efficient 8-Bit Quantization of Transformer Neural Machine Language Translation Modelcited by 58
- 2017Massive Exploration of Neural Machine Translation Architecturescited by 55
- 2015Neural Networks with Few Multiplicationscited by 46
- 2019Fully Quantized Transformer for Machine Translationcited by 36
- 2016Neural versus Phrase-Based Machine Translation Quality: a Case Studycited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.