Interpretability methods of machine learning algorithms with applications in breast cancer diagnosis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Early detection of breast cancer is a powerful tool towards decreasing its socioeconomic burden. Although, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have shown remarkable results towards this goal, their "black box" nature hinders their wide adoption in clinical practice. To address the need for AI guided breast cancer diagnosis, interpretability methods can be utilized. In this study, we used AI methods, i.e., Random Forests (RF), Neural Networks (NN) and Ensembles of Neural Networks (ENN), towards this goal and explained and optimized their performance through interpretability techniques, such as the Global Surrogate (GS) method, the Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) plots and the Shapley values (SV). The Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset of the open UCI repository was used for the training and evaluation of the AI algorithms. The best performance for breast cancer diagnosis was achieved by the proposed ENN (96.6% accuracy and 0.96 area under the ROC curve), and its predictions were explained by ICE plots, proving that its decisions were compliant with current medical knowledge and can be further utilized to gain new insights in the pathophysiological mechanisms of breast cancer. Feature selection based on features' importance according to the GS model improved the performance of the RF (leading the accuracy from 96.49% to 97.18% and the area under the ROC curve from 0.96 to 0.97) and feature selection based on features' importance according to SV improved the performance of the NN (leading the accuracy from 94.6% to 95.53% and the area under the ROC curve from 0.94 to 0.95). Compared to other approaches on the same dataset, our proposed models demonstrated state of the art performance while being interpretable.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2022.
Builds on
4 of 20 references.
References · 4
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
- 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 403
- 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 355
- 2020An explainable XGBoost-based approach towards assessing the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellituscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyondcited by 6
- 2024A comprehensive interpretable machine learning framework for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease diagnosiscited by 3
- 2023"Honey, Tell Me What's Wrong", Global Explanation of Textual Discriminative Models through Cooperative Generationcited by 0
- 2024A comprehensive interpretable machine learning framework for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease diagnosis12 Dec 2024
- 2023"Honey, Tell Me What's Wrong", Global Explanation of Textual Discriminative Models through Cooperative Generation27 Oct 2023
- 2023Ethical Framework for Harnessing the Power of AI in Healthcare and Beyond31 Aug 2023