mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning for Ultrasound Speed-of-Sound Reconstruction: Impacts of Training Data Diversity on Stability and Robustness

arXiv 2202.01208 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2022eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ultrasound b-mode imaging is a qualitative approach and diagnostic quality strongly depends on operators' training and experience. Quantitative approaches can provide information about tissue properties; therefore, can be used for identifying various tissue types, e.g., speed-of-sound in the tissue can be used as a biomarker for tissue malignancy, especially in breast imaging. Recent studies showed the possibility of speed-of-sound reconstruction using deep neural networks that are fully trained on simulated data. However, because of the ever-present domain shift between simulated and measured data, the stability and performance of these models in real setups are still under debate. In prior works, for training data generation, tissue structures were modeled as simplified geometrical structures which does not reflect the complexity of the real tissues. In this study, we proposed a new simulation setup for training data generation based on Tomosynthesis images. We combined our approach with the simplified geometrical model and investigated the impacts of training data diversity on the stability and robustness of an existing network architecture. We studied the sensitivity of the trained network to different simulation parameters, e.g., echogenicity, number of scatterers, noise, and geometry. We showed that the network trained with the joint set of data is more stable on out-of-domain simulated data as well as measured phantom data.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 103 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2022.

Builds on

23 of 103 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  4. 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 515
  5. 2014Predicting Depth, Surface Normals and Semantic Labels with a Common Multi-Scale Convolutional Architecturecited by 483
  6. 2016Deeper Depth Prediction with Fully Convolutional Residual Networkscited by 402
  7. 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 359
  8. 2020Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognitioncited by 273
  9. 2016Single-Image Depth Perception in the Wildcited by 179
  10. 2018An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRIcited by 140
  11. 2015How much data is needed to train a medical image deep learning system to achieve necessary high accuracy?cited by 45
  12. 2019Deep learning in ultrasound imagingcited by 38
11 more
  1. 2018A Gentle Introduction to Deep Learning in Medical Image Processingcited by 34
  2. 2019Adaptive and Compressive Beamforming Using Deep Learning for Medical Ultrasoundcited by 12
  3. 2018A Deep Learning Framework for Single-Sided Sound Speed Inversion in Medical Ultrasoundcited by 10
  4. 2017Efficient B-mode Ultrasound Image Reconstruction from Sub-sampled RF Data using Deep Learningcited by 8
  5. 2021High Resolution 3D Ultrasonic Breast Imaging by Time-Domain Full Waveform Inversioncited by 8
  6. 2021Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging Using Physics-based Models And Learning-based Plug-And-Play Priorscited by 8
  7. 2017Towards CT-quality Ultrasound Imaging using Deep Learningcited by 7
  8. 2019Deep Variational Networks with Exponential Weighting for Learning Computed Tomographycited by 7
  9. 2020Training Variational Networks with Multi-Domain Simulations: Speed-of-Sound Image Reconstructioncited by 5
  10. 2020Domain Adaptation for Ultrasound Beamformingcited by 3
  11. 2019Detecting muscle activation using ultrasound speed of sound inversion with deep learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

3 papers.