MHSnet: Multi-head and Spatial Attention Network with False-Positive Reduction for Pulmonary Nodules Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The mortality of lung cancer has ranked high among cancers for many years. Early detection of lung cancer is critical for disease prevention, cure, and mortality rate reduction. However, existing detection methods on pulmonary nodules introduce an excessive number of false positive proposals in order to achieve high sensitivity, which is not practical in clinical situations. In this paper, we propose the multi-head detection and spatial squeeze-and-attention network, MHSnet, to detect pulmonary nodules, in order to aid doctors in the early diagnosis of lung cancers. Specifically, we first introduce multi-head detectors and skip connections to customize for the variety of nodules in sizes, shapes and types and capture multi-scale features. Then, we implement a spatial attention module to enable the network to focus on different regions differently inspired by how experienced clinicians screen CT images, which results in fewer false positive proposals. Lastly, we present a lightweight but effective false positive reduction module with the Linear Regression model to cut down the number of false positive proposals, without any constraints on the front network. Extensive experimental results compared with the state-of-the-art models have shown the superiority of the MHSnet in terms of the average FROC, sensitivity and especially false discovery rate (2.98% and 2.18% improvement in terms of average FROC and sensitivity, 5.62% and 28.33% decrease in terms of false discovery rate and average candidates per scan). The false positive reduction module significantly decreases the average number of candidates generated per scan by 68.11% and the false discovery rate by 13.48%, which is promising to reduce distracted proposals for the downstream tasks based on the detection results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.
Builds on
10 of 22 references.
References · 10
- 2019GCNet: Non-local Networks Meet Squeeze-Excitation Networks and Beyondcited by 331
- 2016Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challengecited by 198
- 2018Concurrent Spatial and Channel Squeeze & Excitation in Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 120
- 2017Evaluate the Malignancy of Pulmonary Nodules Using the 3D Deep Leaky Noisy-or Networkcited by 53
- 2018DeepLung: Deep 3D Dual Path Nets for Automated Pulmonary Nodule Detection and Classificationcited by 36
- 2017Accurate Pulmonary Nodule Detection in Computed Tomography Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2019NoduleNet: Decoupled False Positive Reductionfor Pulmonary Nodule Detection and Segmentationcited by 21
- 2019DeepSEED: 3D Squeeze-and-Excitation Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Neural Networks for Pulmonary Nodule Detectioncited by 15
- 2021SCPM-Net: An Anchor-free 3D Lung Nodule Detection Network using Sphere Representation and Center Points Matchingcited by 12
- 2017Automated Pulmonary Nodule Detection via 3D ConvNets with Online Sample Filtering and Hybrid-Loss Residual Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.