mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning in fNIRS: A review

arXiv 2201.13371 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2022q-bio.NCcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Significance: Optical neuroimaging has become a well-established clinical and research tool to monitor cortical activations in the human brain. It is notable that outcomes of functional Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies depend heavily on the data processing pipeline and classification model employed. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) methodologies have demonstrated fast and accurate performances in data processing and classification tasks across many biomedical fields. Aim: We aim to review the emerging DL applications in fNIRS studies. Approach: We first introduce some of the commonly used DL techniques. Then the review summarizes current DL work in some of the most active areas of this field, including brain-computer interface, neuro-impairment diagnosis, and neuroscience discovery. Results: Of the 63 papers considered in this review, 32 report a comparative study of deep learning techniques to traditional machine learning techniques where 26 have been shown outperforming the latter in terms of classification accuracy. Additionally, 8 studies also utilize deep learning to reduce the amount of preprocessing typically done with fNIRS data or increase the amount of data via data augmentation. Conclusions: The application of DL techniques to fNIRS studies has shown to mitigate many of the hurdles present in fNIRS studies such as lengthy data preprocessing or small sample sizes while achieving comparable or improved classification accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

12 papers.