LinSyn: Synthesizing Tight Linear Bounds for Arbitrary Neural Network Activation Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The most scalable approaches to certifying neural network robustness depend on computing sound linear lower and upper bounds for the network's activation functions. Current approaches are limited in that the linear bounds must be handcrafted by an expert, and can be sub-optimal, especially when the network's architecture composes operations using, for example, multiplication such as in LSTMs and the recently popular Swish activation. The dependence on an expert prevents the application of robustness certification to developments in the state-of-the-art of activation functions, and furthermore the lack of tightness guarantees may give a false sense of insecurity about a particular model. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to consider the problem of automatically computing tight linear bounds for arbitrary n-dimensional activation functions. We propose LinSyn, the first approach that achieves tight bounds for any arbitrary activation function, while only leveraging the mathematical definition of the activation function itself. Our approach leverages an efficient heuristic approach to synthesize bounds that are tight and usually sound, and then verifies the soundness (and adjusts the bounds if necessary) using the highly optimized branch-and-bound SMT solver, dReal. Even though our approach depends on an SMT solver, we show that the runtime is reasonable in practice, and, compared with state of the art, our approach often achieves 2-5X tighter final output bounds and more than quadruple certified robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.
Builds on
25 of 47 references.
References · 25
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 262
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
- 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
- 2016Measuring Neural Net Robustness with Constraintscited by 90
13 more
- 2020Robustness Verification for Transformerscited by 76
- 2020Verification of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using ImageStarscited by 75
- 2019Quantitative Verification of Neural Networks And its Security Applicationscited by 56
- 2018CNN-Cert: An Efficient Framework for Certifying Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 50
- 2017Geometric robustness of deep networks: analysis and improvementcited by 45
- 2020Reach-SDP: Reachability Analysis of Closed-Loop Systems with Neural Network Controllers via Semidefinite Programmingcited by 43
- 2019POPQORN: Quantifying Robustness of Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2020ReluDiff: Differential Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
- 2020NeuroDiff: Scalable Differential Verification of Neural Networks using Fine-Grained Approximationcited by 22
- 2020Scalable Polyhedral Verification of Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2020DiffRNN: Differential Verification of Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2018Delta-Decision Procedures for Exists-Forall Problems over the Realscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
- 2022Abstraction and Refinement: Towards Scalable and Exact Verification of Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2023Reliability Assurance for Deep Neural Network Architectures Against Numerical Defectscited by 3
- 2023A Tale of Two Approximations: Tightening Over-Approximation for DNN Robustness Verification via Under-Approximationcited by 2
- 2025Probabilistically Tightened Linear Relaxation-based Perturbation Analysis for Neural Network Verificationcited by 2
- 2025SAIL: Sound Abstract Interpreters with LLMscited by 2
- 2022Towards Global Neural Network Abstractions with Locally-Exact Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2022DualApp: Tight Over-Approximation for Neural Network Robustness Verification via Under-Approximationcited by 0
- 2026Neural Network Verification using Partial Multi-Neuron Relaxationcited by 0
- 2026Shifting-based Optimizable Linear Relaxations for General Activation Functionscited by 0
- 2026Shifting-based Optimizable Linear Relaxations for General Activation Functions18 Jun 2026
- 2026Neural Network Verification using Partial Multi-Neuron Relaxation28 May 2026
- 2025SAIL: Sound Abstract Interpreters with LLMs17 Nov 2025
- 2025Probabilistically Tightened Linear Relaxation-based Perturbation Analysis for Neural Network Verification7 Jul 2025
- 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearities31 May 2024
- 2023A Tale of Two Approximations: Tightening Over-Approximation for DNN Robustness Verification via Under-Approximation26 May 2023
- 2023Reliability Assurance for Deep Neural Network Architectures Against Numerical Defects13 Feb 2023
- 2022DualApp: Tight Over-Approximation for Neural Network Robustness Verification via Under-Approximation21 Nov 2022
- 2022Towards Global Neural Network Abstractions with Locally-Exact Reconstruction21 Oct 2022
- 2022Abstraction and Refinement: Towards Scalable and Exact Verification of Neural Networks2 Jul 2022