mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Metric Distortion of Multiwinner Voting

arXiv 2201.13332 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2022cs.GTcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We extend the recently introduced framework of metric distortion to multiwinner voting. In this framework, n agents and m alternatives are located in an underlying metric space. The exact distances between agents and alternatives are unknown. Instead, each agent provides a ranking of the alternatives, ordered from the closest to the farthest. Typically, the goal is to select a single alternative that approximately minimizes the total distance from the agents, and the worst-case approximation ratio is termed distortion. In the case of multiwinner voting, the goal is to select a committee of k alternatives that (approximately) minimizes the total cost to all agents. We consider the scenario where the cost of an agent for a committee is her distance from the q-th closest alternative in the committee. We reveal a surprising trichotomy on the distortion of multiwinner voting rules in terms of k and q: The distortion is unbounded when q ≤ k/3, asymptotically linear in the number of agents when k/3 < q ≤ k/2, and constant when q > k/2.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

7 papers.