mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are Mutually Intelligible Languages Easier to Translate?

arXiv 2201.13072 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2022cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Two languages are considered mutually intelligible if their native speakers can communicate with each other, while using their own mother tongue. How does the fact that humans perceive a language pair as mutually intelligible affect the ability to learn a translation model between them? We hypothesize that the amount of data needed to train a neural ma-chine translation model is anti-proportional to the languages' mutual intelligibility. Experiments on the Romance language group reveal that there is indeed strong correlation between the area under a model's learning curve and mutual intelligibility scores obtained by studying human speakers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.

Builds on

3 of 7 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  3. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488

Built on by

Not cited yet.