mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Coordinated Attacks against Contextual Bandits: Fundamental Limits and Defense Mechanisms

arXiv 2201.12700 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.ITcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by online recommendation systems, we propose the problem of finding the optimal policy in multitask contextual bandits when a small fraction α < 1/2 of tasks (users) are arbitrary and adversarial. The remaining fraction of good users share the same instance of contextual bandits with S contexts and A actions (items). Naturally, whether a user is good or adversarial is not known in advance. The goal is to robustly learn the policy that maximizes rewards for good users with as few user interactions as possible. Without adversarial users, established results in collaborative filtering show that O(1/ε2) per-user interactions suffice to learn a good policy, precisely because information can be shared across users. This parallelization gain is fundamentally altered by the presence of adversarial users: unless there are super-polynomial number of users, we show a lower bound of tildeOmega(min(S,A) · α2 / ε2) it per-user interactions to learn an ε-optimal policy for the good users. We then show we can achieve an tildeO(min(S,A)· α/ε2) upper-bound, by employing efficient robust mean estimators for both uni-variate and high-dimensional random variables. We also show that this can be improved depending on the distributions of contexts.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2022.

Builds on

26 of 48 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 391
  2. 2016Robust Estimators in High Dimensions without the Computational Intractabilitycited by 209
  3. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  4. 2014Online Clustering of Banditscited by 99
  5. 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 91
  6. 2017Being Robust (in High Dimensions) Can Be Practicalcited by 83
  7. 2017Mixture Models, Robustness, and Sum of Squares Proofscited by 81
  8. 2019Corruption-robust exploration in episodic reinforcement learningcited by 72
  9. 2021RL for Latent MDPs: Regret Guarantees and a Lower Boundcited by 69
  10. 2013Sample Complexity of Multi-task Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  11. 2020Impact of Representation Learning in Linear Banditscited by 51
  12. 2017Multi-Task Learning for Contextual Banditscited by 47
14 more
  1. 2021Near-optimal Representation Learning for Linear Bandits and Linear RLcited by 45
  2. 2016On Context-Dependent Clustering of Banditscited by 43
  3. 2018High-Dimensional Robust Mean Estimation in Nearly-Linear Timecited by 39
  4. 2019Robust subgaussian estimation of a mean vector in nearly linear timecited by 37
  5. 2020The Gossiping Insert-Eliminate Algorithm for Multi-Agent Banditscited by 37
  6. 2015A Survey on Contextual Multi-armed Banditscited by 34
  7. 2016Contextual Bandits with Latent Confounders: An NMF Approachcited by 26
  8. 2020Problem-Complexity Adaptive Model Selection for Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 26
  9. 2016Refined Lower Bounds for Adversarial Banditscited by 20
  10. 2019How Hard Is Robust Mean Estimation?cited by 16
  11. 2021Reinforcement Learning in Reward-Mixing MDPscited by 15
  12. 2016Low-rank Bandits with Latent Mixturescited by 11
  13. 2020Regime Switching Banditscited by 9
  14. 2021Cooperative Stochastic Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandits Robust to Adversarial Corruptionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.

4 papers.