mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transformer Module Networks for Systematic Generalization in Visual Question Answering

arXiv 2201.11316 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformers achieve great performance on Visual Question Answering (VQA). However, their systematic generalization capabilities, i.e., handling novel combinations of known concepts, is unclear. We reveal that Neural Module Networks (NMNs), i.e., question-specific compositions of modules that tackle a sub-task, achieve better or similar systematic generalization performance than the conventional Transformers, even though NMNs' modules are CNN-based. In order to address this shortcoming of Transformers with respect to NMNs, in this paper we investigate whether and how modularity can bring benefits to Transformers. Namely, we introduce Transformer Module Network (TMN), a novel NMN based on compositions of Transformer modules. TMNs achieve state-of-the-art systematic generalization performance in three VQA datasets, improving more than 30% over standard Transformers for novel compositions of sub-tasks. We show that not only the module composition but also the module specialization for each sub-task are the key of such performance gain.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2022.

Builds on

26 of 37 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  5. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  7. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  8. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  9. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  10. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  11. 2021MDETR -- Modulated Detection for End-to-End Multi-Modal Understandingcited by 811
  12. 2019Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-trainingcited by 451
14 more
  1. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 375
  2. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
  3. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  4. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  5. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  6. 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
  7. 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
  8. 2019CLOSURE: Assessing Systematic Generalization of CLEVR Modelscited by 63
  9. 2018Transparency by Design: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in Visual Reasoningcited by 51
  10. 2020Measuring Systematic Generalization in Neural Proof Generation with Transformerscited by 43
  11. 2019Meta Module Network for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 39
  12. 2021Systematic Generalization with Edge Transformerscited by 38
  13. 2020*-CFQ: Analyzing the Scalability of Machine Learning on a Compositional Taskcited by 16
  14. 2021How Modular Should Neural Module Networks Be for Systematic Generalization?cited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.