mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dissecting the impact of different loss functions with gradient surgery

arXiv 2201.11307 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pair-wise loss is an approach to metric learning that learns a semantic embedding by optimizing a loss function that encourages images from the same semantic class to be mapped closer than images from different classes. The literature reports a large and growing set of variations of the pair-wise loss strategies. Here we decompose the gradient of these loss functions into components that relate to how they push the relative feature positions of the anchor-positive and anchor-negative pairs. This decomposition allows the unification of a large collection of current pair-wise loss functions. Additionally, explicitly constructing pair-wise gradient updates to separate out these effects gives insights into which have the biggest impact, and leads to a simple algorithm that beats the state of the art for image retrieval on the CAR, CUB and Stanford Online products datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2022.

Builds on

18 of 27 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  4. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  5. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
  6. 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
  7. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
  8. 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
  9. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  10. 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
  11. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
  12. 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
6 more
  1. 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
  2. 2017Smart Mining for Deep Metric Learningcited by 96
  3. 2020Hard negative examples are hard, but usefulcited by 82
  4. 2019Improved Embeddings with Easy Positive Triplet Miningcited by 66
  5. 2017Learning Spread-out Local Feature Descriptorscited by 34
  6. 2019P2SGrad: Refined Gradients for Optimizing Deep Face Modelscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.