Dissecting the impact of different loss functions with gradient surgery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pair-wise loss is an approach to metric learning that learns a semantic embedding by optimizing a loss function that encourages images from the same semantic class to be mapped closer than images from different classes. The literature reports a large and growing set of variations of the pair-wise loss strategies. Here we decompose the gradient of these loss functions into components that relate to how they push the relative feature positions of the anchor-positive and anchor-negative pairs. This decomposition allows the unification of a large collection of current pair-wise loss functions. Additionally, explicitly constructing pair-wise gradient updates to separate out these effects gives insights into which have the biggest impact, and leads to a simple algorithm that beats the state of the art for image retrieval on the CAR, CUB and Stanford Online products datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2022.
Builds on
18 of 27 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
- 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2015Deep Metric Learning via Lifted Structured Feature Embeddingcited by 449
- 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
- 2020Circle Loss: A Unified Perspective of Pair Similarity Optimizationcited by 402
- 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
- 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 317
- 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
- 2020Proxy Anchor Loss for Deep Metric Learningcited by 195
6 more
- 2019SoftTriple Loss: Deep Metric Learning Without Triplet Samplingcited by 163
- 2017Smart Mining for Deep Metric Learningcited by 96
- 2020Hard negative examples are hard, but usefulcited by 82
- 2019Improved Embeddings with Easy Positive Triplet Miningcited by 66
- 2017Learning Spread-out Local Feature Descriptorscited by 34
- 2019P2SGrad: Refined Gradients for Optimizing Deep Face Modelscited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022A Simple Structure For Building A Robust Modelcited by 1
- 2022A Simple Structure For Building A Robust Model25 Apr 2022