mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Image features of a splashing drop on a solid surface extracted using a feedforward neural network

arXiv 2201.09541 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2022physics.flu-dyn cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This article reports nonintuitive characteristic of a splashing drop on a solid surface discovered through extracting image features using a feedforward neural network (FNN). Ethanol of area-equivalent radius about 1.29 mm was dropped from impact heights ranging from 4 cm to 60 cm (splashing threshold 20 cm) and impacted on a hydrophilic surface. The images captured when half of the drop impacted the surface were labeled according to their outcome, splashing or nonsplashing, and were used to train an FNN. A classification accuracy higher than 96% was achieved. To extract the image features identified by the FNN for classification, the weight matrix of the trained FNN for identifying splashing drops was visualized. Remarkably, the visualization showed that the trained FNN identified the contour height of the main body of the impacting drop as an important characteristic differentiating between splashing and nonsplashing drops, which has not been reported in previous studies. This feature was found throughout the impact, even when one and three-quarters of the drop impacted the surface. To confirm the importance of this image feature, the FNN was retrained to classify using only the main body without checking for the presence of ejected secondary droplets. The accuracy was still higher than 82%, confirming that the contour height is an important feature distinguishing splashing from nonsplashing drops. Several aspects of drop impact are analyzed and discussed with the aim of identifying the possible mechanism underlying the difference in contour height between splashing and nonsplashing drops.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2022.

Builds on

8 of 71 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  4. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 380
  5. 2020Physics guided machine learning using simplified theoriescited by 23
  6. 2020Deep-learning of Parametric Partial Differential Equations from Sparse and Noisy Datacited by 19
  7. 2020Semi Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder for Flow Reconstruction and Uncertainty Quantification from Limited Observationscited by 13
  8. 2020Transfer learning for nonlinear dynamics and its application to fluid turbulencecited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.