mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Comprehensive Study of Vision Transformers on Dense Prediction Tasks

arXiv 2201.08683 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2022cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), architectures consisting of convolutional layers, have been the standard choice in vision tasks. Recent studies have shown that Vision Transformers (VTs), architectures based on self-attention modules, achieve comparable performance in challenging tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation. However, the image processing mechanism of VTs is different from that of conventional CNNs. This poses several questions about their generalizability, robustness, reliability, and texture bias when used to extract features for complex tasks. To address these questions, we study and compare VT and CNN architectures as feature extractors in object detection and semantic segmentation. Our extensive empirical results show that the features generated by VTs are more robust to distribution shifts, natural corruptions, and adversarial attacks in both tasks, whereas CNNs perform better at higher image resolutions in object detection. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that VTs in dense prediction tasks produce more reliable and less texture-biased predictions.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2022.

Builds on

27 of 31 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 1,998
  12. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
15 more
  1. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  2. 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,789
  3. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  4. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  5. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
  6. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
  7. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 858
  8. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  9. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
  10. 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
  11. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 357
  12. 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 250
  13. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  14. 2020Data Movement Is All You Need: A Case Study on Optimizing Transformerscited by 108
  15. 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.