mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conceptor Learning for Class Activation Mapping

arXiv 2201.08636 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Class Activation Mapping (CAM) has been widely adopted to generate saliency maps which provides visual explanations for deep neural networks (DNNs). The saliency maps are conventionally generated by fusing the channels of the target feature map using a weighted average scheme. It is a weak model for the inter-channel relation, in the sense that it only models the relation among channels in a contrastive way (i.e., channels that play key roles in the prediction are given higher weights for them to stand out in the fusion). The collaborative relation, which makes the channels work together to provide cross reference, has been ignored. Furthermore, the model has neglected the intra-channel relation thoroughly.In this paper, we address this problem by introducing Conceptor learning into CAM generation. Conceptor leaning has been originally proposed to model the patterns of state changes in recurrent neural networks (RNNs). By relaxing the dependency of Conceptor learning to RNNs, we make Conceptor-CAM not only generalizable to more DNN architectures but also able to learn both the inter- and intra-channel relations for better saliency map generation. Moreover, we have enabled the use of Boolean operations to combine the positive and pseudo-negative evidences, which has made the CAM inference more robust and comprehensive. The effectiveness of Conceptor-CAM has been validated with both formal verifications and experiments on the dataset of the largest scale in literature. The experimental results show that Conceptor-CAM is compatible with and can bring significant improvement to all well recognized CAM-based methods, and has outperformed the state-of-the-art methods by 43.14%~72.79% (88.39%~168.15%) on ILSVRC2012 in Average Increase (Drop), 15.42%~42.55% (47.09%~372.09%) on VOC, and 17.43%~31.32% (47.54%~206.45%) on COCO, respectively.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2022.

Builds on

19 of 36 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  8. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  10. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  11. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  12. 2019Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecturecited by 468
7 more
  1. 2017Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approachcited by 201
  2. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
  3. 2020SS-CAM: Smoothed Score-CAM for Sharper Visual Feature Localizationcited by 46
  4. 2020IS-CAM: Integrated Score-CAM for axiomatic-based explanationscited by 29
  5. 2017Two-Phase Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 21
  6. 2014Controlling Recurrent Neural Networks by Conceptorscited by 16
  7. 2018Unsupervised Post-processing of Word Vectors via Conceptor Negationcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.