mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

"Project smells" -- Experiences in Analysing the Software Quality of ML Projects with mllint

arXiv 2201.08246 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2022cs.SE cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML) projects incur novel challenges in their development and productionisation over traditional software applications, though established principles and best practices in ensuring the project's software quality still apply. While using static analysis to catch code smells has been shown to improve software quality attributes, it is only a small piece of the software quality puzzle, especially in the case of ML projects given their additional challenges and lower degree of Software Engineering (SE) experience in the data scientists that develop them. We introduce the novel concept of project smells which consider deficits in project management as a more holistic perspective on software quality in ML projects. An open-source static analysis tool mllint was also implemented to help detect and mitigate these. Our research evaluates this novel concept of project smells in the industrial context of ING, a global bank and large software- and data-intensive organisation. We also investigate the perceived importance of these project smells for proof-of-concept versus production-ready ML projects, as well as the perceived obstructions and benefits to using static analysis tools such as mllint. Our findings indicate a need for context-aware static analysis tools, that fit the needs of the project at its current stage of development, while requiring minimal configuration effort from the user.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2022.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Machine Learning Testing: Survey, Landscapes and Horizonscited by 213
  2. 2020Adoption and Effects of Software Engineering Best Practices in Machine Learningcited by 33
  3. 2020AI Lifecycle Models Need To Be Revised. An Exploratory Study in Fintechcited by 33
  4. 2019Studying Software Engineering Patterns for Designing Machine Learning Systemscited by 24
  5. 2021Characterizing Technical Debt and Antipatterns in AI-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 21
  6. 2020Code Smells and Refactoring: A Tertiary Systematic Review of Challenges and Observationscited by 18
  7. 2021The Prevalence of Code Smells in Machine Learning projectscited by 16
  8. 2020Software engineering for artificial intelligence and machine learning software: A systematic literature reviewcited by 15
  9. 2021Practices for Engineering Trustworthy Machine Learning Applicationscited by 8
  10. 2021Using AntiPatterns to avoid MLOps Mistakescited by 5
  11. 2021Quality Assurance Challenges for Machine Learning Software Applications During Software Development Life Cycle Phasescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.