mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Online Bid Optimization with Return on Investment and Budget Constraints

arXiv 2201.07139 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In online marketing, the advertisers aim to balance achieving high volumes and high profitability. The companies' business units address this tradeoff by maximizing the volumes while guaranteeing a minimum Return On Investment (ROI) level. Such a task can be naturally modeled as a combinatorial optimization problem subject to ROI and budget constraints that can be solved online. In this picture, the learner's uncertainty over the constraints' parameters plays a crucial role since the algorithms' exploration choices might lead to their violation during the entire learning process. Such violations represent a major obstacle to adopting online techniques in real-world applications. Thus, controlling the algorithms' exploration during learning is paramount to making humans trust online learning tools. This paper studies the nature of both optimization and learning problems. In particular, we show that the learning problem is inapproximable within any factor (unless P = NP) and provide a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm to solve its discretized version. Subsequently, we prove that no online learning algorithm can violate the (ROI or budget) constraints a sublinear number of times during the learning process while guaranteeing a sublinear regret. We provide the GCB algorithm that guarantees sublinear regret at the cost of a linear number of constraint violations and GCBsafe that guarantees w.h.p. a constant upper bound on the number of constraint violations at the cost of a linear regret. Moreover, we designed GCBsafe(psi,φ), which guarantees both sublinear regret and safety w.h.p. at the cost of accepting tolerances psi and φ in the satisfaction of the ROI and budget constraints, respectively. Finally, we provide experimental results to compare the regret and constraint violations of GCB, GCBsafe, and GCBsafe(psi,φ).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2022.

Builds on

8 of 40 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
  2. 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 163
  3. 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 51
  4. 2014Safe Exploration of State and Action Spaces in Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  5. 2020Stage-wise Conservative Linear Banditscited by 28
  6. 2014Exploration vs Exploitation vs Safety: Risk-averse Multi-Armed Banditscited by 26
  7. 2017Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Knapsackscited by 23
  8. 2020Online Joint Bid/Daily Budget Optimization of Internet Advertising Campaignscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.