mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Risk bounds for PU learning under Selected At Random assumption

arXiv 2201.06277 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2022math.ST stat.ML stat.THcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Positive-unlabeled learning (PU learning) is known as a special case of semi-supervised binary classification where only a fraction of positive examples are labeled. The challenge is then to find the correct classifier despite this lack of information. Recently, new methodologies have been introduced to address the case where the probability of being labeled may depend on the covariates. In this paper, we are interested in establishing risk bounds for PU learning under this general assumption. In addition, we quantify the impact of label noise on PU learning compared to standard classification setting. Finally, we provide a lower bound on minimax risk proving that the upper bound is almost optimal.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2022.

Builds on

6 of 31 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  2. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  3. 2020Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Trainingcited by 47
  4. 2018Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 36
  5. 2016Estimating the class prior and posterior from noisy positives and unlabeled datacited by 25
  6. 2018Instance-Dependent PU Learning by Bayesian Optimal Relabelingcited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.