mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes

arXiv 2201.05759 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.CY stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most fair machine learning methods either highly rely on the sensitive information of the training samples or require a large modification on the target models, which hinders their practical application. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set (second stage) where the sample weights are computed to balance the model performance across different demographic groups (first stage). FAIRIF can be applied on a wide range of models trained by stochastic gradient descent without changing the model, while only requiring group annotations on a small validation set to compute sample weights. Theoretically, we show that, in the classification setting, three notions of disparity among different groups can be mitigated by training with the weights. Experiments on synthetic data sets demonstrate that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias; and on real-world data sets, we show the effectiveness and scalability of FAIRIF. Moreover, as evidenced by the experiments with pretrained models, FAIRIF is able to alleviate the unfairness issue of pretrained models without hurting their performance.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2022.

Builds on

29 of 62 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  3. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  7. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  8. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  9. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  10. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
  11. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  12. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
17 more
  1. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  2. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  3. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 275
  4. 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
  5. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  6. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  7. 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 191
  8. 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
  9. 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
  10. 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
  11. 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
  12. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 92
  13. 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
  14. 2019On Second-Order Group Influence Functions for Black-Box Predictionscited by 78
  15. 2020Not All Unlabeled Data are Equal: Learning to Weight Data in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 53
  16. 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 48
  17. 2016Second-Order Stochastic Optimization for Machine Learning in Linear Timecited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

12 papers.