FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most fair machine learning methods either highly rely on the sensitive information of the training samples or require a large modification on the target models, which hinders their practical application. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set (second stage) where the sample weights are computed to balance the model performance across different demographic groups (first stage). FAIRIF can be applied on a wide range of models trained by stochastic gradient descent without changing the model, while only requiring group annotations on a small validation set to compute sample weights. Theoretically, we show that, in the classification setting, three notions of disparity among different groups can be mitigated by training with the weights. Experiments on synthetic data sets demonstrate that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias; and on real-world data sets, we show the effectiveness and scalability of FAIRIF. Moreover, as evidenced by the experiments with pretrained models, FAIRIF is able to alleviate the unfairness issue of pretrained models without hurting their performance.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2022.
Builds on
29 of 62 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 522
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
17 more
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 275
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
- 2020Coresets via Bilevel Optimization for Continual Learning and Streamingcited by 191
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 146
- 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 92
- 2019Conditional Learning of Fair Representationscited by 78
- 2019On Second-Order Group Influence Functions for Black-Box Predictionscited by 78
- 2020Not All Unlabeled Data are Equal: Learning to Weight Data in Semi-supervised Learningcited by 53
- 2021Interactive Label Cleaning with Example-based Explanationscited by 48
- 2016Second-Order Stochastic Optimization for Machine Learning in Linear Timecited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Comprehensive Fair Meta-learned Recommender Systemcited by 18
- 2024OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 12
- 2025A Snapshot of Influence: A Local Data Attribution Framework for Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2025Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Productscited by 10
- 2022Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Functioncited by 8
- 2025Group-robust Sample Reweighting for Subpopulation Shifts via Influence Functionscited by 6
- 2024Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M): Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data Selectioncited by 5
- 2024Influence-based Attributions can be Manipulatedcited by 2
- 2025Delayed Feedback Modeling with Influence Functionscited by 1
- 2025Revisiting Data Attribution for Influence Functionscited by 1
- 2026Detecting labeling bias using influence functionscited by 1
- 2025A case for data valuation transparency via DValCardscited by 0
- 2026Detecting labeling bias using influence functions22 Feb 2026
- 2025Revisiting Data Attribution for Influence Functions10 Aug 2025
- 2025Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products19 Jul 2025
- 2025A case for data valuation transparency via DValCards29 Jun 2025
- 2025A Snapshot of Influence: A Local Data Attribution Framework for Online Reinforcement Learning25 May 2025
- 2025Group-robust Sample Reweighting for Subpopulation Shifts via Influence Functions10 Mar 2025
- 2025Delayed Feedback Modeling with Influence Functions1 Feb 2025
- 2024Influence-based Attributions can be Manipulated8 Sep 2024
- 2024OxonFair: A Flexible Toolkit for Algorithmic Fairness30 Jun 2024
- 2024Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M): Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data Selection24 Jun 2024
- 2022Comprehensive Fair Meta-learned Recommender System9 Jun 2022
- 2022Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Function25 May 2022