mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transfer-Tuning: Reusing Auto-Schedules for Efficient Tensor Program Code Generation

arXiv 2201.05587 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2022cs.LG cs.NE cs.PFcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Auto-scheduling for tensor programs is a process where a search algorithm automatically explores candidate schedules (program transformations) for a given program on a target hardware platform to improve its performance. However this can be a very time consuming process depending on the complexity of the tensor program and the capacity of the target device, with often many thousands of program variants being explored. To address this, in this paper we introduce the idea of transfer-tuning, a novel approach to identify and reuse auto-schedules between tensor programs. We demonstrate this concept using Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), taking sets of auto-schedules from pre-tuned DNNs and using them to reduce the inference time of a new DNN. We compare transfer-tuning against the state-of-the-art Ansor auto-scheduler, defining the maximum possible speedup for a given DNN model as what Ansor achieves using its recommended full tuning time. On a server-class CPU and across 11 widely used DNN models, we observe that transfer-tuning achieves up to 88.41% (49.13% on average) of this maximum speedup, while Ansor requires 6.5× more search time on average to match it. We also evaluate transfer-tuning on a constrained edge CPU and observe that the differences in search time are exacerbated, with Ansor requiring 10.8× more time on average to match transfer-tuning's speedup, which further demonstrates its value. Our code is available at https://www.github.com/gicLAB/transfer-tuning

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2022.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  8. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  9. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  10. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  11. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  12. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
13 more
  1. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  2. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  3. 2017Dynamic Routing Between Capsulescited by 689
  4. 2020MobileBERT: a Compact Task-Agnostic BERT for Resource-Limited Devicescited by 476
  5. 2014cuDNN: Efficient Primitives for Deep Learningcited by 240
  6. 2020Ansor: Generating High-Performance Tensor Programs for Deep Learningcited by 199
  7. 2018Learning to Optimize Tensor Programscited by 138
  8. 2018Tiramisu: A Polyhedral Compiler for Expressing Fast and Portable Codecited by 53
  9. 2021CompilerGym: Robust, Performant Compiler Optimization Environments for AI Researchcited by 41
  10. 2021A Deep Learning Based Cost Model for Automatic Code Optimizationcited by 33
  11. 2020Chameleon: Adaptive Code Optimization for Expedited Deep Neural Network Compilationcited by 29
  12. 2020Optimizing Grouped Convolutions on Edge Devicescited by 12
  13. 2019From Dark Matter to Galaxies with Convolutional Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.