mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

De-Noising of Photoacoustic Microscopy Images by Deep Learning

arXiv 2201.04302 ↗First posted 12 Jan 2022eess.IV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As a hybrid imaging technology, photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) imaging suffers from noise due to the maximum permissible exposure of laser intensity, attenuation of ultrasound in the tissue, and the inherent noise of the transducer. De-noising is a post-processing method to reduce noise, and PAM image quality can be recovered. However, previous de-noising techniques usually heavily rely on mathematical priors as well as manually selected parameters, resulting in unsatisfactory and slow de-noising performance for different noisy images, which greatly hinders practical and clinical applications. In this work, we propose a deep learning-based method to remove complex noise from PAM images without mathematical priors and manual selection of settings for different input images. An attention enhanced generative adversarial network is used to extract image features and remove various noises. The proposed method is demonstrated on both synthetic and real datasets, including phantom (leaf veins) and in vivo (mouse ear blood vessels and zebrafish pigment) experiments. The results show that compared with previous PAM de-noising methods, our method exhibits good performance in recovering images qualitatively and quantitatively. In addition, the de-noising speed of 0.016 s is achieved for an image with 256×256 pixels. Our approach is effective and practical for the de-noising of PAM images.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2022.

Builds on

8 of 41 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  5. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
  6. 2019GCNet: Non-local Networks Meet Squeeze-Excitation Networks and Beyondcited by 331
  7. 2017Low Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network with Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Losscited by 162
  8. 2020Deep Learning Improves Contrast in Low-Fluence Photoacoustic Imagingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.