mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

End-To-End Optimization of LiDAR Beam Configuration for 3D Object Detection and Localization

arXiv 2201.03860 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2022cs.RO cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing learning methods for LiDAR-based applications use 3D points scanned under a pre-determined beam configuration, e.g., the elevation angles of beams are often evenly distributed. Those fixed configurations are task-agnostic, so simply using them can lead to sub-optimal performance. In this work, we take a new route to learn to optimize the LiDAR beam configuration for a given application. Specifically, we propose a reinforcement learning-based learning-to-optimize (RL-L2O) framework to automatically optimize the beam configuration in an end-to-end manner for different LiDAR-based applications. The optimization is guided by the final performance of the target task and thus our method can be integrated easily with any LiDAR-based application as a simple drop-in module. The method is especially useful when a low-resolution (low-cost) LiDAR is needed, for instance, for system deployment at a massive scale. We use our method to search for the beam configuration of a low-resolution LiDAR for two important tasks: 3D object detection and localization. Experiments show that the proposed RL-L2O method improves the performance in both tasks significantly compared to the baseline methods. We believe that a combination of our method with the recent advances of programmable LiDARs can start a new research direction for LiDAR-based active perception. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/vniclas/lidar_beam_selection

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2022.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  3. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  4. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  5. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
  6. 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
  7. 2020Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 409
  8. 2019From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Networkcited by 366
  9. 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
  10. 2019The Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset: A Radar Extension to the Oxford RobotCar Datasetcited by 133
  11. 2020Weakly Supervised 3D Object Detection from Lidar Point Cloudcited by 67
  12. 2019Loam_livox: A fast, robust, high-precision LiDAR odometry and mapping package for LiDARs of small FoVcited by 27
3 more
  1. 2016Parse Geometry from a Line: Monocular Depth Estimation with Partial Laser Observationcited by 14
  2. 2020Adaptive LiDAR Sampling and Depth Completion using Ensemble Variancecited by 8
  3. 2019Generating All the Roads to Rome: Road Layout Randomization for Improved Road Marking Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

4 papers.