End-To-End Optimization of LiDAR Beam Configuration for 3D Object Detection and Localization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing learning methods for LiDAR-based applications use 3D points scanned under a pre-determined beam configuration, e.g., the elevation angles of beams are often evenly distributed. Those fixed configurations are task-agnostic, so simply using them can lead to sub-optimal performance. In this work, we take a new route to learn to optimize the LiDAR beam configuration for a given application. Specifically, we propose a reinforcement learning-based learning-to-optimize (RL-L2O) framework to automatically optimize the beam configuration in an end-to-end manner for different LiDAR-based applications. The optimization is guided by the final performance of the target task and thus our method can be integrated easily with any LiDAR-based application as a simple drop-in module. The method is especially useful when a low-resolution (low-cost) LiDAR is needed, for instance, for system deployment at a massive scale. We use our method to search for the beam configuration of a low-resolution LiDAR for two important tasks: 3D object detection and localization. Experiments show that the proposed RL-L2O method improves the performance in both tasks significantly compared to the baseline methods. We believe that a combination of our method with the recent advances of programmable LiDARs can start a new research direction for LiDAR-based active perception. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/vniclas/lidar_beam_selection
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2022.
Builds on
15 of 39 references.
References · 15
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
- 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
- 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
- 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
- 2020Voxel R-CNN: Towards High Performance Voxel-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 409
- 2019From Points to Parts: 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud with Part-aware and Part-aggregation Networkcited by 366
- 2019Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 188
- 2019The Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset: A Radar Extension to the Oxford RobotCar Datasetcited by 133
- 2020Weakly Supervised 3D Object Detection from Lidar Point Cloudcited by 67
- 2019Loam_livox: A fast, robust, high-precision LiDAR odometry and mapping package for LiDARs of small FoVcited by 27
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Task-Driven Implicit Representations for Automated Design of LiDAR Systems28 May 2025
- 2023LiDAR Meta Depth Completion24 Jul 2023
- 2023STEPS: Joint Self-supervised Nighttime Image Enhancement and Depth Estimation2 Feb 2023
- 2022CU-Net: LiDAR Depth-Only Completion With Coupled U-Net26 Oct 2022