Learning with Less Labels in Digital Pathology via Scribble Supervision from Natural Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A critical challenge of training deep learning models in the Digital Pathology (DP) domain is the high annotation cost by medical experts. One way to tackle this issue is via transfer learning from the natural image domain (NI), where the annotation cost is considerably cheaper. Cross-domain transfer learning from NI to DP is shown to be successful via class labels. One potential weakness of relying on class labels is the lack of spatial information, which can be obtained from spatial labels such as full pixel-wise segmentation labels and scribble labels. We demonstrate that scribble labels from NI domain can boost the performance of DP models on two cancer classification datasets (Patch Camelyon Breast Cancer and Colorectal Cancer dataset). Furthermore, we show that models trained with scribble labels yield the same performance boost as full pixel-wise segmentation labels despite being significantly easier and faster to collect.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2022.
Builds on
13 of 19 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,431
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
- 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
- 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 331
- 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
- 2019Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A surveycited by 165
- 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
- 2018Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 112
Built on by
Not cited yet.