mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Development of an Extractive Clinical Question Answering Dataset with Multi-Answer and Multi-Focus Questions

arXiv 2201.02517 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2022cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background: Extractive question-answering (EQA) is a useful natural language processing (NLP) application for answering patient-specific questions by locating answers in their clinical notes. Realistic clinical EQA can have multiple answers to a single question and multiple focus points in one question, which are lacking in the existing datasets for development of artificial intelligence solutions. Objective: Create a dataset for developing and evaluating clinical EQA systems that can handle natural multi-answer and multi-focus questions. Methods: We leveraged the annotated relations from the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) corpus to generate an EQA dataset. Specifically, the 1-to-N, M-to-1, and M-to-N drug-reason relations were included to form the multi-answer and multi-focus QA entries, which represent more complex and natural challenges in addition to the basic one-drug-one-reason cases. A baseline solution was developed and tested on the dataset. Results: The derived RxWhyQA dataset contains 96,939 QA entries. Among the answerable questions, 25% require multiple answers, and 2% ask about multiple drugs within one question. There are frequent cues observed around the answers in the text, and 90% of the drug and reason terms occur within the same or an adjacent sentence. The baseline EQA solution achieved a best f1-measure of 0.72 on the entire dataset, and on specific subsets, it was: 0.93 on the unanswerable questions, 0.48 on single-drug questions versus 0.60 on multi-drug questions, 0.54 on the single-answer questions versus 0.43 on multi-answer questions. Discussion: The RxWhyQA dataset can be used to train and evaluate systems that need to handle multi-answer and multi-focus questions. Specifically, multi-answer EQA appears to be challenging and therefore warrants more investment in research.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2022.

Builds on

11 of 30 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  3. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  4. 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 995
  5. 2018The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answeringcited by 235
  6. 2018emrQA: A Large Corpus for Question Answering on Electronic Medical Recordscited by 134
  7. 2021Biomedical Question Answering: A Survey of Approaches and Challengescited by 46
  8. 2019A Multi-Type Multi-Span Network for Reading Comprehension that Requires Discrete Reasoningcited by 41
  9. 2020Clinical Reading Comprehension: A Thorough Analysis of the emrQA Datasetcited by 23
  10. 2021Sequence tagging for biomedical extractive question answeringcited by 12
  11. 2018Annotating Electronic Medical Records for Question Answeringcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.