mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Recommendations for repositories and scientific gateways from a neuroscience perspective

arXiv 2201.00727 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2022cs.CY cs.DL q-bio.NCcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital services such as repositories and science gateways have become key resources for the neuroscience community, but users often have a hard time orienting themselves in the service landscape to find the best fit for their particular needs. INCF (International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility) has developed a set of recommendations and associated criteria for choosing or setting up and running a repository or scientific gateway, intended for the neuroscience community, with a FAIR neuroscience perspective. These recommendations have neurosciences as their primary use case but are often general. Considering the perspectives of researchers and providers of repositories as well as scientific gateways, the recommendations harmonize and complement existing work on criteria for repositories and best practices. The recommendations cover a range of important areas including accessibility, licensing, community responsibility and technical and financial sustainability of a service.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.