mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improved Topic modeling in Twitter through Community Pooling

arXiv 2201.00690 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2021cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social networks play a fundamental role in propagation of information and news. Characterizing the content of the messages becomes vital for different tasks, like breaking news detection, personalized message recommendation, fake users detection, information flow characterization and others. However, Twitter posts are short and often less coherent than other text documents, which makes it challenging to apply text mining algorithms to these datasets efficiently. Tweet-pooling (aggregating tweets into longer documents) has been shown to improve automatic topic decomposition, but the performance achieved in this task varies depending on the pooling method. In this paper, we propose a new pooling scheme for topic modeling in Twitter, which groups tweets whose authors belong to the same community (group of users who mainly interact with each other but not with other groups) on a user interaction graph. We present a complete evaluation of this methodology, state of the art schemes and previous pooling models in terms of the cluster quality, document retrieval tasks performance and supervised machine learning classification score. Results show that our Community polling method outperformed other methods on the majority of metrics in two heterogeneous datasets, while also reducing the running time. This is useful when dealing with big amounts of noisy and short user-generated social media texts. Overall, our findings contribute to an improved methodology for identifying the latent topics in a Twitter dataset, without the need of modifying the basic machinery of a topic decomposition model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2021.

Builds on

1 of 25 references.

References · 1

  1. 2018The Remarkable Benefit of User-Level Aggregation for Lexical-based Population-Level Predictionscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.