mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Succinct Differentiation of Disparate Boosting Ensemble Learning Methods for Prognostication of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis

arXiv 2201.00418 ↗First posted 2 Jan 2022cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prognostication of medical problems using the clinical data by leveraging the Machine Learning techniques with stellar precision is one of the most important real world challenges at the present time. Considering the medical problem of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome also known as PCOS is an emerging problem in women aged from 15 to 49. Diagnosing this disorder by using various Boosting Ensemble Methods is something we have presented in this paper. A detailed and compendious differentiation between Adaptive Boost, Gradient Boosting Machine, XGBoost and CatBoost with their respective performance metrics highlighting the hidden anomalies in the data and its effects on the result is something we have presented in this paper. Metrics like Confusion Matrix, Precision, Recall, F1 Score, FPR, RoC Curve and AUC have been used in this paper.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2022.

Builds on

2 of 14 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 8; 2023: 1.

9 papers.