Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow-Based Samplers Scale Up
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A trivializing map is a field transformation whose Jacobian determinant exactly cancels the interaction terms in the action, providing a representation of the theory in terms of a deterministic transformation of a distribution from which sampling is trivial. Recently, a proof-of-principle study by Albergo, Kanwar and Shanahan [arXiv:1904.12072] demonstrated that approximations of trivializing maps can be `machine-learned' by a class of invertible, differentiable neural models called textitnormalizing flows. By ensuring that the Jacobian determinant can be computed efficiently, asymptotically exact sampling from the theory of interest can be performed by drawing samples from a simple distribution and passing them through the network. From a theoretical perspective, this approach has the potential to become more efficient than traditional Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling techniques, where autocorrelations severely diminish the sampling efficiency as one approaches the continuum limit. A major caveat is that it is not yet understood how the size of models and the cost of training them is expected to scale. As a first step, we have conducted an exploratory scaling study using two-dimensional φ4 with up to 202 lattice sites. Although the scope of our study is limited to a particular model architecture and training algorithm, initial results paint an interesting picture in which training costs grow very quickly indeed. We describe a candidate explanation for the poor scaling, and outline our intentions to clarify the situation in future work.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2021.
Builds on
8 of 15 references.
References · 8
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2019Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theorycited by 147
- 2020Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theorycited by 102
- 2020Sampling using SU(N) gauge equivariant flowscited by 83
- 2021Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theoriescited by 27
- 2021Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theorycited by 25
- 2020Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Detecting and Mitigating Mode-Collapse for Flow-based Sampling of Lattice Field Theoriescited by 25
- 2022Path-Gradient Estimators for Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 10
- 2022Simulating first-order phase transition with hierarchical autoregressive networkscited by 5
- 2023Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Testscited by 5
- 2024Empirical evaluation of normalizing flows in Markov Chain Monte Carlocited by 1
- 2024Empirical evaluation of normalizing flows in Markov Chain Monte Carlo22 Dec 2024
- 2023Detecting and Mitigating Mode-Collapse for Flow-based Sampling of Lattice Field Theories27 Feb 2023
- 2023Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Tests23 Feb 2023
- 2022Simulating first-order phase transition with hierarchical autoregressive networks9 Dec 2022
- 2022Path-Gradient Estimators for Continuous Normalizing Flows17 Jun 2022