mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

State Selection Algorithms and Their Impact on The Performance of Stateful Network Protocol Fuzzing

arXiv 2112.15498 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2021cs.SE cs.CR cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The statefulness property of network protocol implementations poses a unique challenge for testing and verification techniques, including Fuzzing. Stateful fuzzers tackle this challenge by leveraging state models to partition the state space and assist the test generation process. Since not all states are equally important and fuzzing campaigns have time limits, fuzzers need effective state selection algorithms to prioritize progressive states over others. Several state selection algorithms have been proposed but they were implemented and evaluated separately on different platforms, making it hard to achieve conclusive findings. In this work, we evaluate an extensive set of state selection algorithms on the same fuzzing platform that is AFLNet, a state-of-the-art fuzzer for network servers. The algorithm set includes existing ones supported by AFLNet and our novel and principled algorithm called AFLNetLegion. The experimental results on the ProFuzzBench benchmark show that (i) the existing state selection algorithms of AFLNet achieve very similar code coverage, (ii) AFLNetLegion clearly outperforms these algorithms in selected case studies, but (iii) the overall improvement appears insignificant. These are unexpected yet interesting findings. We identify problems and share insights that could open opportunities for future research on this topic.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2021.

Builds on

8 of 38 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Surveycited by 62
  2. 2018Evaluating Fuzz Testingcited by 32
  3. 2020Magma: A Ground-Truth Fuzzing Benchmarkcited by 16
  4. 2018Smart Greybox Fuzzingcited by 6
  5. 2021StateAFL: Greybox Fuzzing for Stateful Network Serverscited by 4
  6. 2021ProFuzzBench: A Benchmark for Stateful Protocol Fuzzingcited by 3
  7. 2020Legion: Best-First Concolic Testingcited by 2
  8. 2021Guidelines on Minimum Standards for Developer Verification of Softwarecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.