mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reachability Analysis for FollowerStopper: Safety Analysis and Experimental Results

arXiv 2112.14345 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2021eess.SY cs.MA cs.ROcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by earlier work and the developer of a new algorithm, the FollowerStopper, this article uses reachability analysis to verify the safety of the FollowerStopper algorithm, which is a controller designed for dampening stop- and-go traffic waves. With more than 1100 miles of driving data collected by our physical platform, we validate our analysis results by comparing it to human driving behaviors. The FollowerStopper controller has been demonstrated to dampen stop-and-go traffic waves at low speed, but previous analysis on its relative safety has been limited to upper and lower bounds of acceleration. To expand upon previous analysis, reachability analysis is used to investigate the safety at the speeds it was originally tested and also at higher speeds. Two formulations of safety analysis with different criteria are shown: distance-based and time headway-based. The FollowerStopper is considered safe with distance-based criterion. However, simulation results demonstrate that the FollowerStopper is not representative of human drivers - it follows too closely behind vehicles, specifically at a distance human would deem as unsafe. On the other hand, under the time headway-based safety analysis, the FollowerStopper is not considered safe anymore. A modified FollowerStopper is proposed to satisfy time-based safety criterion. Simulation results of the proposed FollowerStopper shows that its response represents human driver behavior better.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.