An AGM Approach to Revising Preferences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We look at preference change arising out of an interaction between two elements: the first is an initial preference ranking encoding a pre-existing attitude; the second element is new preference information signaling input from an authoritative source, which may come into conflict with the initial preference. The aim is to adjust the initial preference and bring it in line with the new preference, without having to give up more information than necessary. We model this process using the formal machinery of belief change, along the lines of the well-known AGM approach. We propose a set of fundamental rationality postulates, and derive the main results of the paper: a set of representation theorems showing that preference change according to these postulates can be rationalized as a choice function guided by a ranking on the comparisons in the initial preference order. We conclude by presenting operators satisfying our proposed postulates. Our approach thus allows us to situate preference revision within the larger family of belief change operators.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Dec 2021.
Builds on
1 of 30 references.
References · 1
- 2018Building Ethically Bounded AIcited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.