mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalized Wasserstein Dice Loss, Test-time Augmentation, and Transformers for the BraTS 2021 challenge

arXiv 2112.13054 ↗First posted 24 Dec 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Brain tumor segmentation from multiple Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) modalities is a challenging task in medical image computation. The main challenges lie in the generalizability to a variety of scanners and imaging protocols. In this paper, we explore strategies to increase model robustness without increasing inference time. Towards this aim, we explore finding a robust ensemble from models trained using different losses, optimizers, and train-validation data split. Importantly, we explore the inclusion of a transformer in the bottleneck of the U-Net architecture. While we find transformer in the bottleneck performs slightly worse than the baseline U-Net in average, the generalized Wasserstein Dice loss consistently produces superior results. Further, we adopt an efficient test time augmentation strategy for faster and robust inference. Our final ensemble of seven 3D U-Nets with test-time augmentation produces an average dice score of 89.4% and an average Hausdorff 95% distance of 10.0 mm when evaluated on the BraTS 2021 testing dataset. Our code and trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/LucasFidon/TRABIT_BraTS2021.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Dec 2021.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  3. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
  4. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,558
  5. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  6. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  7. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
  8. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
  9. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
  10. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  11. 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  12. 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
8 more
  1. 2017On the Compactness, Efficiency, and Representation of 3D Convolutional Networks: Brain Parcellation as a Pretext Taskcited by 36
  2. 2021Are we using appropriate segmentation metrics? Identifying correlates of human expert perception for CNN training beyond rolling the DICE coefficientcited by 26
  3. 2017Generalised Wasserstein Dice Score for Imbalanced Multi-class Segmentation using Holistic Convolutional Networkscited by 21
  4. 2019Neural parameters estimation for brain tumor growth modelingcited by 11
  5. 2021Distributionally Robust Segmentation of Abnormal Fetal Brain 3D MRIcited by 8
  6. 2020Generalized Wasserstein Dice Score, Distributionally Robust Deep Learning, and Ranger for brain tumor segmentation: BraTS 2020 challengecited by 7
  7. 2020Comparative study of deep learning methods for the automatic segmentation of lung, lesion and lesion type in CT scans of COVID-19 patientscited by 5
  8. 2021Partial supervision for the FeTA challenge 2021cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.