mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Simplicity Bubble Problem in Formal-Theoretic Learning Systems

arXiv 2112.12275 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2021cs.IT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When mining large datasets in order to predict new data, limitations of the principles behind statistical machine learning pose a serious challenge not only to the Big Data deluge, but also to the traditional assumptions that data generating processes are biased toward low algorithmic complexity. Even when one assumes an underlying algorithmic-informational bias toward simplicity in finite dataset generators, we show that current approaches to machine learning (including deep learning, or any formal-theoretic hybrid mix of top-down AI and statistical machine learning approaches), can always be deceived, naturally or artificially, by sufficiently large datasets. In particular, we demonstrate that, for every learning algorithm (with or without access to a formal theory), there is a sufficiently large dataset size above which the algorithmic probability of an unpredictable deceiver is an upper bound (up to a multiplicative constant that only depends on the learning algorithm) for the algorithmic probability of any other larger dataset. In other words, very large and complex datasets can deceive learning algorithms into a ``simplicity bubble'' as likely as any other particular non-deceiving dataset. These deceiving datasets guarantee that any prediction effected by the learning algorithm will unpredictably diverge from the high-algorithmic-complexity globally optimal solution while converging toward the low-algorithmic-complexity locally optimal solution, although the latter is deemed a global one by the learning algorithm. We discuss the framework and additional empirical conditions to be met in order to circumvent this deceptive phenomenon, moving away from statistical machine learning towards a stronger type of machine learning based on, and motivated by, the intrinsic power of algorithmic information theory and computability theory.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2021.

Builds on

2 of 32 references.

References · 2

  1. 2021Can stable and accurate neural networks be computed? -- On the barriers of deep learning and Smale's 18th problemcited by 53
  2. 2016The "paradox" of computability and a recursive relative version of the Busy Beaver functioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.