Discovering State Variables Hidden in Experimental Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
All physical laws are described as relationships between state variables that give a complete and non-redundant description of the relevant system dynamics. However, despite the prevalence of computing power and AI, the process of identifying the hidden state variables themselves has resisted automation. Most data-driven methods for modeling physical phenomena still assume that observed data streams already correspond to relevant state variables. A key challenge is to identify the possible sets of state variables from scratch, given only high-dimensional observational data. Here we propose a new principle for determining how many state variables an observed system is likely to have, and what these variables might be, directly from video streams. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach using video recordings of a variety of physical dynamical systems, ranging from elastic double pendulums to fire flames. Without any prior knowledge of the underlying physics, our algorithm discovers the intrinsic dimension of the observed dynamics and identifies candidate sets of state variables. We suggest that this approach could help catalyze the understanding, prediction and control of increasingly complex systems. Project website is at: https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~bchen/neural-state-variables
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2021.
Builds on
0 of 7 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
- 2022Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constantscited by 24
- 2024Self-supervised contrastive learning performs non-linear system identificationcited by 9
- 2024Causal Deciphering and Inpainting in Spatio-Temporal Dynamics via Diffusion Modelcited by 6
- 2023Exploring how a Generative AI interprets musiccited by 4
- 2022Neural Information Squeezer for Causal Emergencecited by 3
- 2023Volume-Preserving Transformers for Learning Time Series Data with Structurecited by 3
- 2025LyTimeT: Towards Robust and Interpretable State-Variable Discoverycited by 2
- 2022A Relational Macrostate Theory Guides Artificial Intelligence to Learn Macro and Design Microcited by 1
- 2023Heuristic Hyperparameter Choice for Image Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2024Discovering Car-following Dynamics from Trajectory Data through Deep Learningcited by 1
- 2026How AI Agents Discover Scientific Equations: From Hydrotope Rediscovery to New Water-Wave Amplitudescited by 0
- 2026How AI Agents Discover Scientific Equations: From Hydrotope Rediscovery to New Water-Wave Amplitudes30 Sep 2026
- 2025LyTimeT: Towards Robust and Interpretable State-Variable Discovery22 Oct 2025
- 2024Self-supervised contrastive learning performs non-linear system identification18 Oct 2024
- 2024Causal Deciphering and Inpainting in Spatio-Temporal Dynamics via Diffusion Model29 Sep 2024
- 2024Discovering Car-following Dynamics from Trajectory Data through Deep Learning1 Aug 2024
- 2023Volume-Preserving Transformers for Learning Time Series Data with Structure18 Dec 2023
- 2023Exploring how a Generative AI interprets music31 Jul 2023
- 2023Heuristic Hyperparameter Choice for Image Anomaly Detection20 Jul 2023
- 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Review20 Nov 2022
- 2022Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constants19 Nov 2022
- 2022A Relational Macrostate Theory Guides Artificial Intelligence to Learn Macro and Design Micro13 Oct 2022
- 2022Neural Information Squeezer for Causal Emergence25 Jan 2022