mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Valid inferential models for prediction in supervised learning problems

arXiv 2112.10234 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2021math.ST stat.ME stat.THcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prediction, where observed data is used to quantify uncertainty about a future observation, is a fundamental problem in statistics. Prediction sets with coverage probability guarantees are a common solution, but these do not provide probabilistic uncertainty quantification in the sense of assigning beliefs to relevant assertions about the future observable. Alternatively, we recommend the use of a em probabilistic predictor, a data-dependent (imprecise) probability distribution for the to-be-predicted observation given the observed data. It is essential that the probabilistic predictor be reliable or valid, and here we offer a notion of validity and explore its behavioral and statistical implications. In particular, we show that valid probabilistic predictors must be imprecise, that they avoid sure loss, and that they lead to prediction procedures with desirable frequentist error rate control properties. We provide a general construction of a provably valid probabilistic predictor, which has close connections to the powerful conformal prediction machinery, and we illustrate this construction in regression and classification applications.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

7 papers.