Cryptography from Pseudorandom Quantum States
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pseudorandom states, introduced by Ji, Liu and Song (Crypto'18), are efficiently-computable quantum states that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random states. One-way functions imply the existence of pseudorandom states, but Kretschmer (TQC'20) recently constructed an oracle relative to which there are no one-way functions but pseudorandom states still exist. Motivated by this, we study the intriguing possibility of basing interesting cryptographic tasks on pseudorandom states. We construct, assuming the existence of pseudorandom state generators that map a λ-bit seed to a ω(logλ)-qubit state, (a) statistically binding and computationally hiding commitments and (b) pseudo one-time encryption schemes. A consequence of (a) is that pseudorandom states are sufficient to construct maliciously secure multiparty computation protocols in the dishonest majority setting. Our constructions are derived via a new notion called pseudorandom function-like states (PRFS), a generalization of pseudorandom states that parallels the classical notion of pseudorandom functions. Beyond the above two applications, we believe our notion can effectively replace pseudorandom functions in many other cryptographic applications.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum statescited by 32
- 2022Estimating the randomness of quantum circuit ensembles up to 50 qubitscited by 0
- 2022Unclonability and Quantum Cryptanalysis: From Foundations to Applicationscited by 0
- 2023A quantum tug of war between randomness and symmetries on homogeneous spacescited by 0
- 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomnesscited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and morecited by 0
- 2025Reconquering Bell sampling on qudits: stabilizer learning and testing, quantum pseudorandomness bounds, and more8 Oct 2025
- 2024Noise-tolerant learnability of shallow quantum circuits from statistics and the cost of quantum pseudorandomness20 May 2024
- 2023A quantum tug of war between randomness and symmetries on homogeneous spaces11 Sep 2023
- 2023A survey on the complexity of learning quantum states31 May 2023
- 2022Unclonability and Quantum Cryptanalysis: From Foundations to Applications31 Oct 2022
- 2022Estimating the randomness of quantum circuit ensembles up to 50 qubits19 May 2022