A Formal Model for Polarization under Confirmation Bias in Social Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We describe a model for polarization in multi-agent systems based on Esteban and Ray's standard family of polarization measures from economics. Agents evolve by updating their beliefs (opinions) based on an underlying influence graph, as in the standard DeGroot model for social learning, but under a confirmation bias; i.e., a discounting of opinions of agents with dissimilar views. We show that even under this bias polarization eventually vanishes (converges to zero) if the influence graph is strongly-connected. If the influence graph is a regular symmetric circulation, we determine the unique belief value to which all agents converge. Our more insightful result establishes that, under some natural assumptions, if polarization does not eventually vanish then either there is a disconnected subgroup of agents, or some agent influences others more than she is influenced. We also prove that polarization does not necessarily vanish in weakly-connected graphs under confirmation bias. Furthermore, we show how our model relates to the classic DeGroot model for social learning. We illustrate our model with several simulations of a running example about polarization over vaccines and of other case studies. The theoretical results and simulations will provide insight into the phenomenon of polarization.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Human-AI Coevolutioncited by 27
- 2023Viral Marketing in Social Networks with Competing Productscited by 1
- 2026SoK: Formal Methods for Fact-Checking and Information Integritycited by 0
- 2026SoK: Formal Methods for Fact-Checking and Information Integrity19 Sep 2026
- 2023Viral Marketing in Social Networks with Competing Products25 Dec 2023
- 2023Human-AI Coevolution23 Jun 2023