mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Communication-oriented Model Fine-tuning for Packet-loss Resilient Distributed Inference under Highly Lossy IoT Networks

arXiv 2112.09407 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.NIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The distributed inference (DI) framework has gained traction as a technique for real-time applications empowered by cutting-edge deep machine learning (ML) on resource-constrained Internet of things (IoT) devices. In DI, computational tasks are offloaded from the IoT device to the edge server via lossy IoT networks. However, generally, there is a communication system-level trade-off between communication latency and reliability; thus, to provide accurate DI results, a reliable and high-latency communication system is required to be adapted, which results in non-negligible end-to-end latency of the DI. This motivated us to improve the trade-off between the communication latency and accuracy by efforts on ML techniques. Specifically, we have proposed a communication-oriented model tuning (COMtune), which aims to achieve highly accurate DI with low-latency but unreliable communication links. In COMtune, the key idea is to fine-tune the ML model by emulating the effect of unreliable communication links through the application of the dropout technique. This enables the DI system to obtain robustness against unreliable communication links. Our ML experiments revealed that COMtune enables accurate predictions with low latency and under lossy networks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2021.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  4. 2017Distributed Deep Neural Networks over the Cloud, the Edge and End Devicescited by 120
  5. 2016Binarized Neural Networks: Training Deep Neural Networks with Weights and Activations Constrained to +1 or -1cited by 105
  6. 2019BottleNet++: An End-to-End Approach for Feature Compression in Device-Edge Co-Inference Systemscited by 95
  7. 2020A Lite Distributed Semantic Communication System for Internet of Thingscited by 73
  8. 2020Communication-Computation Trade-Off in Resource-Constrained Edge Inferencecited by 60
  9. 2018JALAD: Joint Accuracy- and Latency-Aware Deep Structure Decoupling for Edge-Cloud Executioncited by 40
  10. 2018Not Just Privacy: Improving Performance of Private Deep Learning in Mobile Cloudcited by 28
  11. 2020Neural Compression and Filtering for Edge-assisted Real-time Object Detection in Challenged Networkscited by 28
  12. 2019Improving Device-Edge Cooperative Inference of Deep Learning via 2-Step Pruningcited by 25
7 more
  1. 2020Communication-Efficient Multimodal Split Learning for mmWave Received Power Predictioncited by 18
  2. 2017A Survey on Low Latency Towards 5G: RAN, Core Network and Caching Solutionscited by 10
  3. 2020Dynamic Compression Ratio Selection for Edge Inference Systems with Hard Deadlinescited by 9
  4. 2021Communication-Efficient Split Learning Based on Analog Communication and Over the Air Aggregationcited by 8
  5. 2018Ultra-Low Latency (ULL) Networks: The IEEE TSN and IETF DetNet Standards and Related 5G ULL Researchcited by 7
  6. 2021Packet-Loss-Tolerant Split Inference for Delay-Sensitive Deep Learning in Lossy Wireless Networkscited by 7
  7. 2021CALTeC: Content-Adaptive Linear Tensor Completion for Collaborative Intelligencecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.