mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Degendering Resumes for Fair Algorithmic Resume Screening

arXiv 2112.08910 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2021cs.CL cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate whether it is feasible to remove gendered information from resumes to mitigate potential bias in algorithmic resume screening. Using a corpus of 709k resumes from IT firms, we first train a series of models to classify the self-reported gender of the applicant, thereby measuring the extent and nature of gendered information encoded in resumes. We then conduct a series of gender obfuscation experiments, where we iteratively remove gendered information from resumes. Finally, we train a resume screening algorithm and investigate the trade-off between gender obfuscation and screening algorithm performance. Results show: (1) There is a significant amount of gendered information in resumes. (2) Lexicon-based gender obfuscation method (i.e. removing tokens that are predictive of gender) can reduce the amount of gendered information to a large extent. However, after a certain point, the performance of the resume screening algorithm starts suffering. (3) General-purpose gender debiasing methods for NLP models such as removing gender subspace from embeddings are not effective in obfuscating gender.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2021.

Builds on

12 of 21 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  5. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  6. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  7. 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 170
  8. 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
  9. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  10. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  11. 2020Towards Robustifying NLI Models Against Lexical Dataset Biasescited by 34
  12. 2016Machine Learned Resume-Job Matching Solutioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.