DuQM: A Chinese Dataset of Linguistically Perturbed Natural Questions for Evaluating the Robustness of Question Matching Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we focus on studying robustness evaluation of Chinese question matching. Most of the previous work on analyzing robustness issue focus on just one or a few types of artificial adversarial examples. Instead, we argue that it is necessary to formulate a comprehensive evaluation about the linguistic capabilities of models on natural texts. For this purpose, we create a Chinese dataset namely DuQM which contains natural questions with linguistic perturbations to evaluate the robustness of question matching models. DuQM contains 3 categories and 13 subcategories with 32 linguistic perturbations. The extensive experiments demonstrate that DuQM has a better ability to distinguish different models. Importantly, the detailed breakdown of evaluation by linguistic phenomenon in DuQM helps us easily diagnose the strength and weakness of different models. Additionally, our experiment results show that the effect of artificial adversarial examples does not work on the natural texts.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2021.
Builds on
20 of 41 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
8 more
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Representation through Knowledge Integrationcited by 301
- 2020Revisiting Pre-Trained Models for Chinese Natural Language Processingcited by 262
- 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 159
- 2020How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?cited by 114
- 2020Syntactic Data Augmentation Increases Robustness to Inference Heuristicscited by 85
- 2020Reevaluating Adversarial Examples in Natural Languagecited by 83
- 2021Why Machine Reading Comprehension Models Learn Shortcuts?cited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022DuReader_retrieval: A Large-scale Chinese Benchmark for Passage Retrieval from Web Search Enginecited by 15
- 2023LM-CPPF: Paraphrasing-Guided Data Augmentation for Contrastive Prompt-Based Few-Shot Fine-Tuningcited by 15
- 2022Less Learn Shortcut: Analyzing and Mitigating Learning of Spurious Feature-Label Correlationcited by 13
- 2024Revealing Trends in Datasets from the 2022 ACL and EMNLP Conferencescited by 0
- 2024Revealing Trends in Datasets from the 2022 ACL and EMNLP Conferences31 Mar 2024
- 2023LM-CPPF: Paraphrasing-Guided Data Augmentation for Contrastive Prompt-Based Few-Shot Fine-Tuning29 May 2023
- 2022Less Learn Shortcut: Analyzing and Mitigating Learning of Spurious Feature-Label Correlation25 May 2022
- 2022DuReader_retrieval: A Large-scale Chinese Benchmark for Passage Retrieval from Web Search Engine19 Mar 2022