Exploring the Asynchronous of the Frequency Spectra of GAN-generated Facial Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid progression of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) has raised a concern of their misuse for malicious purposes, especially in creating fake face images. Although many proposed methods succeed in detecting GAN-based synthetic images, they are still limited by the need for large quantities of the training fake image dataset and challenges for the detector's generalizability to unknown facial images. In this paper, we propose a new approach that explores the asynchronous frequency spectra of color channels, which is simple but effective for training both unsupervised and supervised learning models to distinguish GAN-based synthetic images. We further investigate the transferability of a training model that learns from our suggested features in one source domain and validates on another target domains with prior knowledge of the features' distribution. Our experimental results show that the discrepancy of spectra in the frequency domain is a practical artifact to effectively detect various types of GAN-based generated images.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2021.
Builds on
10 of 14 references.
References · 10
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,036
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2019Few-Shot Adversarial Learning of Realistic Neural Talking Head Modelscited by 284
- 2020Adversarial Latent Autoencoderscited by 155
- 2019Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Imagescited by 138
- 2020Spatial Frequency Bias in Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
9 papers.
- 2023Quality-Agnostic Deepfake Detection with Intra-model Collaborative Learningcited by 32
- 2024SoK: Systematization and Benchmarking of Deepfake Detectors in a Unified Frameworkcited by 14
- 2023Why Do Facial Deepfake Detectors Fail?cited by 12
- 2022Multimodal Graph Learning for Deepfake Detectioncited by 6
- 2024UGAD: Universal Generative AI Detector utilizing Frequency Fingerprintscited by 5
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networks and Other Generative Modelscited by 3
- 2025LLMs Are Not Yet Ready for Deepfake Image Detectioncited by 3
- 2025FakeChain: Exposing Shallow Cues in Multi-Step Deepfake Detectioncited by 3
- 2025Seeing Through the Blur: Unlocking Defocus Maps for Deepfake Detectioncited by 2
- 2025Seeing Through the Blur: Unlocking Defocus Maps for Deepfake Detection27 Sep 2025
- 2025FakeChain: Exposing Shallow Cues in Multi-Step Deepfake Detection20 Sep 2025
- 2025LLMs Are Not Yet Ready for Deepfake Image Detection12 Jun 2025
- 2024UGAD: Universal Generative AI Detector utilizing Frequency Fingerprints12 Sep 2024
- 2024SoK: Systematization and Benchmarking of Deepfake Detectors in a Unified Framework9 Jan 2024
- 2023Quality-Agnostic Deepfake Detection with Intra-model Collaborative Learning12 Sep 2023
- 2023Why Do Facial Deepfake Detectors Fail?25 Feb 2023
- 2022Multimodal Graph Learning for Deepfake Detection12 Sep 2022
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networks and Other Generative Models8 Jul 2022