mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cognitive and Cultural Topology of Linguistic Categories:A Semantic-Pragmatic Metric Approach

arXiv 2112.06876 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, the field of NLP has seen growing interest in modeling both semantic and pragmatic dimensions. Despite this progress, two key challenges persist: firstly, the complex task of mapping and analyzing the interactions between semantic and pragmatic features; secondly, the insufficient incorporation of relevant insights from related disciplines outside NLP. Addressing these issues, this study introduces a novel geometric metric that utilizes word co-occurrence patterns. This metric maps two fundamental properties - semantic typicality (cognitive) and pragmatic salience (socio-cultural) - for basic-level categories within a two-dimensional hyperbolic space. Our evaluations reveal that this semantic-pragmatic metric produces mappings for basic-level categories that not only surpass traditional cognitive semantics benchmarks but also demonstrate significant socio-cultural relevance. This finding proposes that basic-level categories, traditionally viewed as semantics-driven cognitive constructs, should be examined through the lens of both semantic and pragmatic dimensions, highlighting their role as a cognitive-cultural interface. The broad contribution of this paper lies in the development of medium-sized, interpretable, and human-centric language embedding models, which can effectively blend semantic and pragmatic dimensions to elucidate both the cognitive and socio-cultural significance of linguistic categories.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

10 of 65 references.

References · 10

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 684
  4. 2018Hyperbolic Neural Networkscited by 402
  5. 2018Representation Tradeoffs for Hyperbolic Embeddingscited by 206
  6. 2018Embedding Text in Hyperbolic Spacescited by 76
  7. 2021Do language models learn typicality judgments from text?cited by 32
  8. 2019Is a Single Vector Enough? Exploring Node Polysemy for Network Embeddingcited by 29
  9. 2019Semantic categories of artifacts and animals reflect efficient codingcited by 13
  10. 2021Variation and generality in encoding of syntactic anomaly information in sentence embeddingscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.