mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Information-Theoretic Limits of Quantum Learning via Data Compression

arXiv 2112.06841 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021quant-ph cs.CR cs.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the power of quantum data in machine learning is central to many proposed applications of quantum technologies. While access to quantum data can offer exponential advantages for carefully designed learning tasks and often under strong assumptions on the data distribution, it remains an open question whether such advantages persist in less structured settings and under more realistic, naturally occurring distributions. Motivated by these practical concerns, we introduce a systematic framework based on quantum lossy data compression to bound the power of quantum data in the context of probably approximately correct (PAC) learning. Specifically, we provide lower bounds on the sample complexity of quantum learners for arbitrary functions when data is drawn from Zipf's distribution, a widely used model for the empirical distributions of real-world data. We also establish lower bounds on the size of quantum input data required to learn linear functions, thereby proving the optimality of previous positive results. Beyond learning theory, we show that our framework has applications in secure delegated quantum computation within the measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC) model. In particular, we constrain the amount of private information the server can infer, strengthening the security guarantees of the delegation protocol proposed in (Mantri et al., PRX, 2017).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

15 of 53 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  2. 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 460
  3. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
  4. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
  5. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 326
  6. 2017Quantum machine learning: a classical perspectivecited by 95
  7. 2021Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithmscited by 79
  8. 2016Quantum Recommendation Systemscited by 70
  9. 2018q-means: A quantum algorithm for unsupervised machine learningcited by 55
  10. 2021Exponential separations between learning with and without quantum memorycited by 52
  11. 2016Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Algorithmscited by 33
  12. 2019Quantum Learning Boolean Linear Functions w.r.t. Product Distributionscited by 9
3 more
  1. 2016Flow Ambiguity: A Path Towards Classically Driven Blind Quantum Computationcited by 2
  2. 2019QFactory: classically-instructed remote secret qubits preparationcited by 1
  3. 2019Computationally-secure and composable remote state preparationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.