mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing the influence of prolific collaborations on authors productivity and visibility

arXiv 2112.06607 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021cs.DLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Science has become more collaborative over the past years, a phenomenon that is related to the increase in the number of authors per paper and the emergence of interdisciplinary works featuring specialists of different fields. In such a environment, it is not trivial to quantify the individual impact of researchers. Here we analyze how the most prolific collaboration tie (in terms of co-produced works) of an established researcher influences their productivity and visibility metrics. In particular, we check how the number of produced works, citations and h-index rank of an researcher changes when their works also coauthored by their prolific collaborators are not considered. We observed different patterns of prolific collaborator influence across the major fields of knowledge. More specifically, in formal and applied sciences, the prolific collaborators seem to play an important role to the visibility metrics of authors even when they are among the highly cited. Such a results can help stakeholders to better understand the collaboration patterns and draw measures of success that also consider collaboration ties.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.