mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Active learning with MaskAL reduces annotation effort for training Mask R-CNN

arXiv 2112.06586 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The generalisation performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) is influenced by the quantity, quality, and variety of the training images. Training images must be annotated, and this is time consuming and expensive. The goal of our work was to reduce the number of annotated images needed to train a CNN while maintaining its performance. We hypothesised that the performance of a CNN can be improved faster by ensuring that the set of training images contains a large fraction of hard-to-classify images. The objective of our study was to test this hypothesis with an active learning method that can automatically select the hard-to-classify images. We developed an active learning method for Mask Region-based CNN (Mask R-CNN) and named this method MaskAL. MaskAL involved the iterative training of Mask R-CNN, after which the trained model was used to select a set of unlabelled images about which the model was most uncertain. The selected images were then annotated and used to retrain Mask R-CNN, and this was repeated for a number of sampling iterations. In our study, MaskAL was compared to a random sampling method on a broccoli dataset with five visually similar classes. MaskAL performed significantly better than the random sampling. In addition, MaskAL had the same performance after sampling 900 images as the random sampling had after 2300 images. Compared to a Mask R-CNN model that was trained on the entire training set (14,000 images), MaskAL achieved 93.9% of that model's performance with 17.9% of its training data. The random sampling achieved 81.9% of that model's performance with 16.4% of its training data. We conclude that by using MaskAL, the annotation effort can be reduced for training Mask R-CNN on a broccoli dataset with visually similar classes. Our software is available on https://github.com/pieterblok/maskal.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  5. 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,215
  6. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
  7. 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
  8. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 214
  9. 2017Dropout Sampling for Robust Object Detection in Open-Set Conditionscited by 112
  10. 2018The Limits and Potentials of Deep Learning for Roboticscited by 104
  11. 2019Active Learning for Deep Detection Neural Networkscited by 62
  12. 2017Deep Learning in Robotics: A Review of Recent Researchcited by 42
3 more
  1. 2021Why AI is Harder Than We Thinkcited by 40
  2. 2019Active Learning with Point Supervision for Cost-Effective Panicle Detection in Cereal Cropscited by 8
  3. 2020Semi-supervised Active Learning for Instance Segmentation via Scoring Predictionscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.